See the GCC RUNTIME LIBRARY EXCEPTION for details. –jotik Mar 9 at 10:18 add a comment| 3 Answers 3 active oldest votes up vote 69 down vote accepted That blog post Normally the files found this way are library files—archive files whose members are object files. more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed Note that this problem cannot, in general, be solved by linking statically.
to access some kind of lock or global data structure (similar to how C programs need a shared errno).Shared data implies that whenever more than one part of a program needs The standard startup files are used normally, unless -nostartfiles is used. See the section in the documentation of your linker for permitted values and their meanings. Footnotes On some systems, ‘gcc -shared’ needs to build supplementary stub code for constructors to Another option (and the one I prefer) is to deploy the newer libstdc++.so alongside your application and ensure it is found before the default system libstdc++.so, which can be done by http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Link-Options.html
On some targets, such as bare-board targets without an operating system, the -T option may be required when linking to avoid references to undefined symbols. -Xlinker optionPass option as an option Browse other questions tagged c++ c gcc glibc static-linking or ask your own question. The issues are somewhat subtle for a few cases. First of all, code compiled against different ABIs is simply not binary compatible.
Otherwise, it takes advantage of the linker and optimizes away the linking with the shared version of libgcc, linking with the static version of libgcc by default. The same is true for plain C, but the C ABI is much simpler and has been around a lot longer so it's fairly stable. This fact is important to understand why things fail on AIX. G++: Unrecognized Option '-static-libstdc++' One exception only: the entire binary is statically linked, and never uses dlopen to load anything at runtime either.Statically linking to libgcc: Depends on the system.
These entries are usually resolved by entries in libc. g++/c++ automatically link with -lm, so we do that too.Perhaps there is a cleaner way to alter the lcdf configure setup to achieve the same link line, but I could not The alternatives generally require quite a few link and library options specified in the right order and I find that tricky to get right.by Garrett RooneyNote that linking C++ code statically The only C++ ABI changes introduced since GCC 3.4 have been backward-compatible, meaning the C++ ABI has been stable for nearly nine years.
Make sure it's a 64-bit executable. –user3920237 Oct 10 '14 at 17:22 1 I just compiled a simplish program with only the -static flag: "gcc -o ts --std=c99 --static test.c". G++ Static Warn about any unresolved references (unless overridden by the link editor option -Xlinker -z -Xlinker defs). Not all systems support this option. Since we are still linking dynamically to libstdc++, the runtime support code in libgcc must also be linked dynamically.
However, there are many companies that supply portable Linux binaries that run on a wide range of Linux systems of various versions. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31433592/static-libgcc-and-static-libstdc-not-working Important functions, e.g. Static-libstdc++ Not Working The -static-libstdc++ option directs the g++ driver to link libstdc++ statically, without necessarily linking other libraries statically. -symbolicBind references to global symbols when building a shared object. Clang Static Libstdc++ Only the libraries you specify are passed to the linker, and options specifying linkage of the system libraries, such as -static-libgcc or -shared-libgcc, are ignored.
Code ladder, Cops On Tate's "Endomorphisms of Abelian Varieties over Finite Fields", sketch of proof of main result? If you only use recent versions of GCC, there’s a -shared-libstc++ option.Don’t statically link libc!GCC 2 doesn’t add a libgcc dependency by default (on platforms that don’t have it). Build everything from source with the same version of the same compiler if you can. share|improve this answer answered Nov 29 '12 at 23:34 Alexander L. Cmake Static Link Libstdc++
But it does not work so with static linkage to libstdc++ anymore, since there is no way to work around those new GLIBC symbols.To Dmitry: Strangely, 32 bit libstdc++ does not They use makefiles to build a MinGW cross-compiler and several useful libraries. My intent is to provide answers to some remarkably similar, but independently asked, questions which have appeared recently, on the MinGW-Users and MinGW-MSYS lists. When using the GNU linker, you can also get the same effect with `-Wl,-Map=output.map'. -u symbolPretend the symbol symbol is undefined, to force linking of library modules to define it.
This instructs the linker to add all symbols, not only used ones, to the dynamic symbol table. Gcc Static Linking The problem here is that libtool will not pass to GCC any switches it does not explicitly understand and support. I wrote to bug-automake for advice.Some of the output from configure looked doubtful ("no -lstdc++"), but the binaries seemed to run ...
Both comments and pings are currently closed. 2 Responses to "Statically-linking libstdc++ on AIX" Arindam Mukherjee Says: January 15th, 2007 at 10:16 am If I am trying to distribute binaries for Fedora's 4.6.3 20120306 (Red Hat 4.6.3-2) is ABI compatible with the upstream FSF 4.6.x releases and almost certainly with any 4.6.x from any other distro. If bar.o refers to functions in `z', those functions may not be loaded. Gcc Nostdlib For example, you can specify `-Xlinker -Map=output.map' rather than `-Xlinker -Map -Xlinker output.map'.
Provided that there are static versions of all used libraries installed. up vote 40 down vote favorite 30 I need to deploy a C++ application built on Ubuntu 12.10 with GCC 4.7's libstdc++ to systems running Ubuntu 10.04, which comes with a It does not work to write -Xlinker "-assert definitions", because this passes the entire string as a single argument, which is not what the linker expects. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up static-libgcc and static-libstdc++ not working up vote 0 down vote favorite I try to compile projects with -static -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ in order
If liblsan is available as a shared library, and the -static option is not used, then this links against the shared version of liblsan. Please see the Donate page for more information on how to Donate. This option is supported by most systems using the GNU linker. Therefore, I always statically link to libstdc++.
c++ linux gcc static-libraries libstdc++ share|improve this question asked Nov 29 '12 at 23:12 Nick Hutchinson 2,43442230 @BradTilley Nope. Previous content of this page was confused, misleading and obsolete. kernel version. Otherwise, it will take advantage of the linker and optimize away the linking with the shared version of libgcc, linking with the static version of libgcc by default.
asked 2 years ago viewed 9221 times active 5 months ago Upcoming Events 2016 Community Moderator Election ends in 9 days Visit Chat Linked 39 Linux static linking is dead? 8 If no shared version of libgcc was built when the compiler was configured, these options have no effect.
© Copyright 2017 searchwebmedia.com. All rights reserved.